Jennifer Lopez is struggling to keep exclusive video footage your sweetheart once possessed with her first husband, Ojani Noa, from finding the light of day. The video — which is made up of 27 several hours of video footage — allegedly includes erotic situations through the pair’s honeymoon vacation back in 1997. Noa tried to sell the tape, which has sparked a legal battle with the sexy singer.
But the 41-year-old singer was able to get a the courtroom order with the exception Noa from releasing the tape, by least for any day. In Monday, Oregon County Superior The courtroom Judge David Chalfant ruled in her favor and issued a temporary restraining order stopping the distribution of your film. Yet , the assess declined to avoid media stores from airing the racy footage if they occur to get their hands on that.
Noa’s lawyer, Ed Meyer, is normally arguing that his client didn’t violate any privacy agreements with Lopez if he started searching the job around. He claims that the footage is not really sex strapping and says he’s just making a mockumentary about the couple’s tumultuous relationship.
Despite the fact that Noa was unable to release the movie, this individual still really wants to do so. This individual reportedly states that the strapping is safe to produce given that Lopez possesses withdrawn her claim against him as the case was at arbitration. Regarding to Connected magazine, the master married-dating.org tape within the footage happens to be in a central depository nonetheless Meyer is convinced that they have uncovered a legal loophole and will be allowed to release it soon.
J Lo’s ex-husband has already been caught along with his hand in the cookie container once ahead of, and the “I Can’t Believe It” musician isn’t bringing any chances these times. She just lately sued Noa pertaining to $10 mil claiming that he breached a confidentiality agreement if he attempted to sell off the home online video video from their matrimony, which only lasted 13 months.
Noa has already filed his own court action against the alluring star, making claims that your lover wrongfully fired him coming from her Pasadena restaurant in 2006. He as well attemptedto write a tell-all about their relationship and was blocked simply by Lopez’s legal representatives. In that previous round of litigation, Noa was purchased to pay the singer a settlement and agreed not to expose for monetary gain any seductive details about all their relationship.